Heather Mills was a less-than-candid court witness whose $250 million divorce claim was exorbitant, a judge said in his ruling on her divorce from Paul McCartney.
The 58-page ruling by Judge Hugh Bennett, which was released Tuesday despite Mills' request that it be sealed, offers a candid look inside the couple's often volatile four-year marriage.
Mills, who lost part of her leg when she was hit by a motorcycle, cast McCartney as an abusive, alcoholic husband who cruelly made fun of her disability. But Judge Hugh Bennett's ruling published Tuesday made clear that her angry assertions rang hollow.
Bennett said Mills, 40, had "unreasonably" expected that she would be able to live the deluxe McCartney lifestyle for the rest of her life even after she divorced the pop star.
"Although she strongly denied it, her case boils down to the syndrome of 'me too' or 'if he has it, I want it too,' " he wrote in awarding Mills $48.6 million.
"To some extent she is her own worst enemy," he wrote. "She has an explosive and volatile character."
By contrast, the judge praised McCartney for "consistent, accurate and honest" testimony in the ruling, made public after he rejected Mills' attempt to block its release.
LEARN HOW TO TRADE IN FOREX WITHOUT LOSING YOUR INITIAL INVESTMENT.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Divorce Judge's Ruling calls Heather Mills liar
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment